No Privacy, No Property: The World In 2030 According To The WEF

Individual liberty and private property are to disappear from this planet by 2030 according to the projections and scenarios coming from the World Economic Forum.

What may lie ahead was projected in November 2016 when the WEF published "8 Predictions for the World in 2030." According to the WEF's scenario, the world will become quite a different place from now because how people work and live will undergo a profound change.

The scenario for the world in 2030 is more than just a forecast.

In a publication for the World Economic Forum, the Danish ecoactivist Ida Auken, who had served as her country's minister of the environment from 2011 to 2014 and still is a member of the Danish Parliament, has elaborated a scenario of a world without privacy or property.

In "Welcome to 2030," she envisions a world where "I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better." By 2030, so says her scenario, shopping and owning have become obsolete, because everything that once was a product is now a service.

In this idyllic new world of hers, people have free access to transportation, accommodation, food, "And all the things we need in our daily lives." As these things will become free of charge, "It ended up not making sense for us to own much." There would be no private ownership in houses nor would anyone pay rent, "Because someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it." A person's living room, for example, will be used for business meetings when one is absent.

In her 2019 contribution to the Annual Meeting of the Global Future Councils of the World Economic Forum, Ida Auken foretells how the world may look in the future "If we win the war on climate change." By 2030, when CO2 emissions will be greatly reduced, people will live in a world where meat on the dinner plate "Will be a rare sight" while water and the air will be much cleaner than today.

The World Economic Forum is silent about the question of who will rule in this new world.

Even if the top decision-makers of the new world government were not mean but just technocrats, what reason would an administrative technocracy have to go on with the undesirables? What sense does it make for a technocratic elite to turn the common man into a superman? Why share the benefits of artificial intelligence with the masses and not keep the wealth for the chosen few?

Not being swayed away by the utopian promises, a sober assessment of the plans must come to the conclusion that in this new world, there would be no place for the average person and that they would be put away along with the "Unemployable," "Feeble minded," and "Ill bred." Behind the preaching of the progressive gospel of social justice by the promoters of the Great Reset and the establishment of a new world order lurks the sinister project of eugenics, which as a technique is now called "Genetic engineering" and as a movement is named "Transhumanism," a term coined by Julian Huxley, the first director of the UNESCO. The promoters of the project keep silent about who will be the rulers in this new world.

The world is getting greener and a fall in the growth rate of the world population is already underway.

The World Economic Forum and its related institutions in combination with a handful of governments and a few high-tech companies want to lead the world into a new era without property or privacy.